Independent coverage for America's merchants
ALL STATE MERCHANTS

INSIGHTS FOR SMBS AND SMES

Craig fine law library portrait — supplied illustration for Craig A. Fine legal commentary
Legal

When Partners Disagree: Craig A. Fine on Keeping Decisions Grounded

Jodi Neilson asks attorney Craig A. Fine about business disputes.

2 min read

Jodi Neilson asks attorney Craig A. Fine about business disputes.

Reading this conversation: This conversation explores general planning questions. The appropriate steps depend on the documents, jurisdiction and individual circumstances.

Five questions for Craig A. Fine

Jodi Neilson: Craig, what do you need to understand when an owner first says that the partnership is no longer working?

Craig A. Fine: I would separate the immediate problem from the longer history. Is a payment blocked, a decision overdue or trust between the owners breaking down? Then I would ask which entity and agreements are involved, who currently controls operations and whether a deadline or threatened action needs prompt attention.

Jodi Neilson: Which documents and records help distinguish the disagreement from assumptions about what each person can do?

Craig A. Fine: The governing agreements, amendments, ownership records and written approvals are a starting point. Financial records and relevant communications help explain the disputed events. I would build a chronology that separates documents from recollections. An ownership percentage or job title alone may not answer the authority question.

Jodi Neilson: How should an owner approach preserving information while respecting access rights and ongoing obligations?

Craig A. Fine: Preserve relevant material through lawful access and discuss a preservation plan with counsel. Do not assume a dispute gives someone permission to enter another person’s account, destroy records or copy every private file. The approach needs to respect confidentiality, access rights and any existing obligations while keeping useful evidence intact.

Jodi Neilson: What practical questions belong in a discussion of negotiation, a buyout or litigation?

Craig A. Fine: Ask what outcome the owner actually needs, how urgent it is and how each route could affect the company. Cost, timing, evidence and the ability to keep operating all matter. Those considerations inform a discussion with counsel; they do not make negotiation or litigation the right answer in every disagreement.

Jodi Neilson: How can the parties evaluate a proposed resolution beyond the headline price?

Craig A. Fine: Discuss payment timing, security, releases, responsibilities for existing obligations and the handover of records or authority. A price can look attractive while important details remain unsettled. The parties should understand what the proposed documents actually accomplish and what risks or duties would remain after signing.

Continue the conversation

Explore Craig A. Fine on business disputes. For primary-source background, see New York LLC Law: Operating Agreements.

Send future interview topics to contact@allstatemerchants.com. Please do not send confidential information about a legal matter.

This interview provides general information, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Laws and circumstances vary. Consult your attorney about your specific situation.

About the author

Jodi Neilson

All State Merchants contributing writer covering practical, source-aware business guidance for SMBs, SMEs and single-location operators.

TaxesPayrollHospitalityCompliance
Related Coverage

Continue reading

Subscribe to AMS

Get AMS articles by email. Confirm your subscription through WordPress.com.

Contribute to AMS

Share your professional experience with retail, online and mobile business owners.

Open contributor application
Add a writing sample, profile or photo (optional)

JPG, PNG or WebP, up to 5 MB.

Discover more from ALL STATE MERCHANTS

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading